Slideshow – Featured Publications
Slideshow controls
June 2010 | English | Pages: 100
This United Nations Development Programme publication covers easy to long-term practices for improving access in transport.
April 2010 | English | Pages: 7
“Rehacomp” on-Governmental Institution of Professional Rehabilitation and Training of the All-Russian Society of the Blind
By: ITU, The Centre for Internet & Society, G3ict, The Hans Foundation
Format: PDF
Size: 953 KB
DownloadFebruary 2010 | English | Pages: 162
The e-Accessibility Policy Handbook for Persons with Disabilities is based upon the online ITU-G3ict e-Accessibility Policy Toolkit for Persons with Disabilities.
February 2010 | English | Pages: 27
UNESCO, in cooperation with the Global Initiative for Inclusive Information and Communication Technologies (G3ict)
February 2010 | English | Pages: 52
Broadband Adoption and Use in America: OBI Working Paper Series No. 1. The Federal Communications Commission’s October-November 2009 survey finds that nearly two-thirds (65%)
October 2009 | English | Pages: 94
Compiled by the Center for Information & Society at the University of Washington.
August 2009 | English | Pages: 22
n his presentation, Mr. Ryuji Nagata, Manager of Product Department, NTT DOCOMO Inc., Japan reviews: (1) Japanese cell phone market
April 2009 | English | Pages: 18
Written by Professor Licia Sbattella, President's Delegate for Disabilities at Politecnico di Milano, Italy
March 2009 | English | Pages: 28
The G3ict Self-Assessment Framework is the first comprehensive tool made available to policy makers to evaluate their country’s compliance with the many dispositions
March 2009 | English | Pages: 15
This is the second in a series of annual reports based on data collected from the Survey of User Needs (SUN)
January 2009 | English | Pages: 19
The 99 tools from the magical pocket of Aki-chan: this research project provides tips on how mobile phones can offer strategies to engage students in learning in ways that best suit their needs.
October 2008 | English | Pages: 8
After a quick review and description of methods, the paper illustrates a comparative test of two web accessibility evaluation methods: conformance testing and barrier walk through |